Biyomedikal Mühendisliği

GBE 350 | Ders Tanıtım Bilgileri

Dersin Adı

Ethics in Science and Research

Kodu	Yarıyıl	Teori (saat/hafta)	Uygulama/Lab (saat/hafta)	Yerel Kredi	AKTS
GBE 350	SPRING	3	0	3	5

Ön-Koşul(lar)	Yok
Dersin Dili	English
Dersin Türü	ELECTIVE_COURSE
Dersin Düzeyi	Lisans
Dersin Veriliş Şekli	Face to Face
Dersin Öğretim Yöntem ve Teknikleri	Discussion Group Work Q&A Lecture / Presentation
Ulusal Meslek Sınıflandırma Kodu	-
Dersin Koordinatörü	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Işınay Ebru Yüzay
Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Işınay Ebru Yüzay
Yardımcı(ları)	-

Dersin Amacı

To understand the importance of ethics in scientific research involving human beings and model organisms. To develop an understanding on the nature of ethical decision-making and its importance in research ethics.

Öğrenme Çıktıları

Bu dersi başarıyla tamamlayabilen öğrenciler;

Ad	Açıklama	PC Alt	* Katkı Düzeyi
Ad	Açıklama	PC Alt	1	2	3	4	5
LO1	Understand the importance of ethics in research and scientific studies					X
LO2	Describe decision-making processes by research ethics committees					X
LO3	Explain privacy and confidentiality related to research ethics and key principles of using animal and human beings in research			X
LO4	Discuss the involvement of science in society and develop solid arguments to defend in a debate setting					X
LO5	Determine research-specific ethical issues involved in biotechnology, genetics, nanotechnology, etc.					X

Ders Tanımı

The course will explore the ethics in science and research with an emphasis on biological sciences. The students will become familiar with common ethical debates in science including the topics listed as: misconduct in research, conflicts of interest and scientific objectivity, publication and peer review, intellectual property, ethical decision-making, dual-use of research, principles of ethics in science for model organisms and human beings.

Dersin İlişkili Olduğu Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

Dersin Kategorisi	Temel Ders
	Uzmanlık/Alan Dersleri	X
	Destek Dersleri
	İletişim ve Yönetim Becerileri Dersleri
	Aktarılabilir Beceri Dersleri

HAFTALIK KONULAR VE İLGİLİ ÖN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI

Hafta	Konular	Ön Hazırlık	Öğrenme Çıktısı
1	Course Introduction – Case Study- Debate	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO1
2	Key principles of ethics in science	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO1
3	Dual-use of Research	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO1
4	Case Study- Debate		-
5	Animal Subjects in Research	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO2
6	Human Subjects in Research	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO3
7	Case Study – Debate		-
8	Midterm / Presentations		-
9	Current Ethical Issues in Biological Sciences	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO5
10	Case Study - Debate		-
11	Data Acquisition & Management, Publication & Peer Review	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO4
12	Collaboration, Conflict of Interest, Authorship Issues	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO5
13	Case Study - Debate		-
14	Science, Society and Social Responsibility	Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council, 2017, ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7	LO4
15	Case Study - Debate		-
16	Final Exam		-

Ders Kitabı

Good Research Practice - Swedish Research Council. 2017. ISBN 978-91-7307-354-7 Shamoo. Adil E. and Resnik. David B. Responsible Conduct of Research. 2 nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 2009

Önerilen Okumalar/Materyaller

Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experimentation. The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the President’s Advisory Committee. http://www.hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap12_3.html. Adam. David and Jonathan Knight. “Publish. and be damned…. ” Nature 419 (2002 Oct. 24): 772-776. Beckwith. Jon and Franklin Huang. “Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science. ” Nature Biotechnology 23 (2005): 1479 – 1480. Barrow. Craig S. and James W. Conrad. Jr.. “Assessing the Reliability and Credibility of Industry Science and Scientists. ” Environmental Health Perspectives 114(2) (2006): 153-155 Kunzig. Robert. “Geoengineering: How to Cool Earth – At a Price. ” Scientific American Magazine (2008 October 20). http//www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=geoengineering-how-to-cool-earth&pri… McArthur. Dan. “Good Ethics Can Sometimes Mean Better Science: Research Ethics and the Milgram Experiments. ”Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2009): 69-79. Moore. Adam and Kristene Unsworth. "Information Ethics: An Introduction. In Information Ethics: Privacy. Property. and Power. ed. Adam Moore (Seattle: University of Washington Press. 2005). 11-28. Nature Editorial. “Three cheers for peers.” Nature 439 (2006 January 12): 118. Resnik. David B. “The Scientist in Society.” In Resnik. The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. (New York: Routledge. 1998). 147 – 172. Rotblat. Joseph. “A Hippocratic Oath for Scientists.” Science 286 (1999): 1475 Sarewitz. Daniel. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7 (2004): 385-403.

DEĞERLENDİRME ÖLÇÜTLERİ

Yarıyıl Aktiviteleri	Sayı	Katkı Payı %	LO1	LO2	LO3	LO4	LO5
Proje	1	20	X	X	X	X	X
Ödev	5	15	X	X	X
Sunum / Jüri Önünde Sunum	5	35	X		X	X	X
Final Sınavı	1	30	X	X	X	X	X
Toplam	12	100

AKTS / İŞ YÜKÜ TABLOSU

Yarıyıl Aktiviteleri	Sayı	Süre (Saat)	İş Yükü
Katılım	-	-	-
Teorik Ders Saati	16	3	48
Laboratuvar / Uygulama Ders Saati	-	-	-
Sınıf Dışı Ders Çalışması	16	2	32
Arazi Çalışması	-	-	-
Küçük Sınav / Stüdyo Kritiği	1	10	10
Portfolyo	-	-	-
Ödev	2	10	20
Sunum / Jüri Önünde Sunum	1	20	20
Proje	-	-	-
Seminer/Çalıştay	-	-	-
Sözlü Sınav	-	-	-
Ara Sınavlar	-	-	-
Final Sınavı	1	20	20
		Toplam	150